Loading...

Progreso Consulting Services: A Responsive Career Services Website


Role
Me - UX Designer,
Researcher
Anselmo F., CEO
Project Duration
4 weeks
(20 hrs/wk)
Per Stakeholder Agreement
tools
Figma
The Noun Project
Coolors

Overview


Background

Progreso Consulting Services is a career consulting service that is being developed in order to match marginalized communities with much need support in order to make the next step in their professional journey.



The Problem

Users struggle when navigating to career consulting websites with understanding how the services offered can meet their specific professional needs. Progreso Consulting Services seeks to develop a responsive website that supports users in matching their specific needs with the services they provide.

The Solution

Through a survey, competitive analysis, secondary research and user interviews, I was able to develop a responsive website that created a positive experience for users as they learned about Progreso Consulting Services and booked consultations.

As I learned more about what users wanted to experience on a career consulting website, I balanced their needs with the financial and time constraints of Progreso Consulting Services and ultimately prioritized building a website that the founder could use to launch their company.

View Final Prototype

* * * * *

Discover



Kickoff

In the beginning stages, I met with the stakeholder in order to establish the problem space and the scope for the project. The stakeholder outlined their need for a website that would allow users to book appointments for their admissions and career consulting business they were launching in 2024. I outlined the design process I would take and the deliverables they would receive at the conclusion of each step of the process.




Literature Review

In order to learn more about the world of admission and career consulting offered by independent and private companies, I conducted a brief survey of sources on Google. I learned that the industry was pretty expansive both in terms of competition and opportunity. There is a range in how privately owned career service companies can meet the needs of clients in terms of using a coaching/advising model versus a pay per service model.




Competitive Analysis

I knew it would be key to have a good understanding of how competitors were creating positive experiences for their customers online. I conducted a competitive analysis on four companies advertising admissions counseling and/or career services services.




I gleaned 4 insights from examining these competitors:

View Competitive Analysis

Surveys

I created a survey to understand what kind of experiences users were having admissions counseling/career services and their websites. However due to time and access constraints, my stakeholder and I were not able to solicit current high schools students and/or their parents for the survey. Furthermore, while it wasn’t a surprise that many had not used these kind of services, it did present an obstacle for my research plan. I initially hypothesized that users would have experience researching the websites for these kind of services.

Users indicated mainly that they had not used these kinds of services before mostly because they had no prior knowledge that these kinds of services existed. When they did have knowledge of these services, they were either too costly or considered unnecessary.

" My high school didn’t provide college consulting services and I didn’t know that existed privately at the time. In college, I didn’t use the career services because I didn’t really understand how they could help me other than helping me with my resume. "
" For school, my family couldn't afford to pay for private services when applying to undergrad. "

User Interviews

I focused my interview protocol around unpacking more about these obstacles to using admissions counseling/career services. I selected five individuals who indicated interest in participating in the interviews on the survey. There were two men and three women between the ages of 29 and 35 who had experience with navigating the undergraduate admissions process and applying to jobs. I recorded each interview on Zoom and took notes.

Summary of Discovery Stage

During the Discover stage, I put together and executed a research plan incorporating the following elements:

  • A project kickoff that allowed the stakeholder and I to reach an understand of their problem description and the scope
  • A literature review into the scope of the admissions and career consulting industry
  • A survey that allowed me to understand the scope of users’ experiences with admissions and career consulting and revealed a lack of experience
  • A competitive analysis enabled me to understand the key features amongst competitors
  • User interviews that allowed me to dive deeper into the why behind users’ lack of engagement with admissions and career consulting

* * * * *

Define


Affinity Map

Following the observational study, I created an affinity map with the data. I found 4 key themes:

I was really struck by the negative perception of these services from folk who had not used them. There was a perception that these kinds of services were reserved for elite and wealthy populations, which prompted some users to avoid these services and judge those who used them. It also surprised me even users whose needs were not met by more traditional guidance counselors, etc. were simply not seeking out these services for whatever reason and were relying on themselves or chance to find support with navigating these processes.

" I definitely have a “I can do it all by myself” mentality when it comes to these services. "
" I look down on people who use these services and find them ridiculous. "
View Affinity Map

Problem Statement

I zoomed in these issues of how a negative perception of these services or the perception that these services were inaccessible might impact a potential user.

This prompted me to focus on how a responsive site could be used to support users with matching their specific needs and experiences with the services provided by a company. That way I could focus on the kind of experience a user needed to have on the website in order to book a consultation.

Personas

There only seemed to be two personas with the major difference between being attitudinal.








Summary of Define Stage

During the Define stage, I defined the problem I needed to solve for with the use of the following elements:

  • An affinity map with the key themes from the user interviews: knowledge, affordability, accessibility and perception
  • I selected a HWM question focused on matching their specific needs and experiences with the services provided by Progreso Consulting Services
  • I also generated 2 personas that diverged in their attitude toward admissions/career consulting being negative vs. neutral

* * * * *

Design


Storyboard

When I presented the problem statement, alongside the insights from the user interviews and the personas, I stressed the importance of defining the target audience for the site. The stakeholder made the decision to focus Progreso Consulting Services on providing career services and targeting an general audience of individuals looking to take the next step in their career. In order to better understand how users would engage with the solution I was developing, I created a storyboard to demonstrate and clarify how a user would engage with Progreso Consulting Services website as a career services platform.





Feature Roadmap

While coming up with a number of ideas of potential ideas using the creative constraints and the analogous inspiration strategies, I leaned heavily on the sites in my competitive analysis as representative of industry standards. I presented the product roadmap with the following features prioritized as must haves to the stakeholder and we agreed to prioritize these features for the MVP version of the site considering both the research and project constraints:





View Feature Roadmap

Site Map

The site's information architecture incorporated the sections outlined in the feature roadmap.

User Flows and Task Flows

The simple site navigation lended itself to simple user flows and task flows. The user’s journey began on the landing page and ended at a booking confirmation after the user reviewed the services offered. Thus, the three task flows involved reading about the company, reviewing the descriptions and pricing of the services offered and booking a consultation.


View User Flows and Task Flows

Landing Page Design

For the design of the dashboard home, I took a lot of inspiration from the designs I reviewed during the competitive analysis. I initially sketched a secondary navigation and breadcrumbs, but went without these in my mid-fidelity wireframes since they were redundant to the primary navigation that already existed within the portal where this dashboard would exist. In the mid-fidelity designs, I added filter drop downs so that this page could be customized to the user’s needs along with labels and icons to more clearly spell out how users could manage each individual card holding a data visualization. I also added pagination at the bottom to also consider how many data visualizations users would see at once versus how much they would have to click next to view more.



Services Page Design

The services page being one of the more text heavy screens, I decided to make sure that the text content was well organized and that users could find the specific services they wanted to learn more about, while also being able to see all the services at a glance. Thus, I implemented tabs for users to filter the types of services between applying, exploring and all. Initially I was using a large pills to represent the clickable tabs on the services screens. These pills were not super responsive when translated to the mobile viewport. In researching best practices for tab design, I stumbled upon an article from Medium that inspired my redesign of the tabs.






Branding

There was a lot of collaboration involved in creating the style kit for Progreso. I had the stakeholder send me reference sites that captured the overall look and feel of Progreso. I also had them narrow down the brand values, typography and color scheme.



Using their preferences, I created and presented 4 style samples of a potential homepage. The style the stakeholder moved forward with had more of an airy, calming and welcoming feel and incorporated blue primary buttons and circles.


Component Design

For the button design, I made sure there was enough padding around the text. It was important to make sure the text size was large enough for readability and that the text was bold and all caps. The stakeholder liked the bright blue for the CTA to add a sense of calm to the site.

View UI Library

Usability Testing

I drafted a usability test plan and collaborated with the stakeholder on finding subjects to test. The main considerations for testing was whether users were able to complete the booking flow and understand the purpose of the site from the landing. Before finalizing the plan, I iterated on the questions to make sure they would actually generate usable feedback. We ended up selected 3/5 of the folks from user interviews with two people chosen by the stakeholder. The pools represented a variety of career stages, the target age group and a variety of professions.




Feedback Prioritization

Testing found no errors with the website in terms of flow all users were successfully able to explore the site and book consultations. Users did however have a lot of rich feedback about how to iterate and improve on the website's design.



I ranked the feedback in terms of how critical it was in terms of potentially impacting the user's journey. I found that from the feedback the most two critical things to address were the communication of the site's purpose via the landing page and the ability to request a free consultation over the phone.



I presented all the findings to the stakeholder and we collaborated on the effort-value matrix. The quick wins we decided on were based on time and effort constraints for the stakeholder. Thus the two revisions I recommended ended up as big bets, requiring a bit more time/effort on the stakeholders behalf.


View Afinity Map

Priority Revisions

I focused my iterations on clarifying the services and outcomes on the services page and landing page and incorporating familiar and accessible UI throughout.



I altered the copy on the services page to make sure it was clear what each service included and when clients could expect deliverables when.

I changed the copy to emphasize the roles clients had before and after using Progreso’s Services, thereby emphasizing the impact of Progreso’s services.



Rather than having users fill in their preferred pronouns, I enabled users to select pronouns from a drop down, which is a more familiar pattern that demonstrates knowledge of equity and inclusion.


On the confirmation screen, I added the advisor’s photo to clarify who the client would be meeting with. I also changed the copy to emphasize the where and when of the consultation meeting. I also added buttons for users to edit, cancel or add the appointment to their calendar.


Summary of the Design Stage

During the Design stage, I designed and tested the website making important considerations about the following elements as I increased the fidelity of my designs:

  • I created a storyboard in order to understand how the responsive website would address the needs of users seeking career consulting services
  • I created a feature roadmap that prioritized screens for services, testimonials, booking, details about the company/founder and contacting the company
  • I designed a site map with a landing page, booking page, services page and about us page
  • I designed user flows that followed a user as they visited the site to learn about the services and eventually booked a consultation
  • I designed each of these key screens incorporating inspiration to make sure all components on the site were responsive as I increased the fidelity of my designs
  • I collaborated with the stakeholder to develop a style guide that represented the company’s brand and develop a library of harmonious components that also fit the brand
  • I created and tested a prototype to see what users thought the purpose and intended audience of the company was from the landing page and how successful they were at learning more about the company’s services and eventually booking a consultation with the company
  • Finally, there was a lot of feedback so I prioritized feedback around clarifying the company’s services and their outcomes for potential users as well as making sure the UI was inclusive and accessible for all types of users


* * * * *

Deliver


Final Design

My design for the final prototype, included below, incorporated all the feedback the stakeholder and I had decided to iterate on including a redesigned confirmation screens, modified copy in the services and landing page and modified UI patterns in the booking flow.





Next Steps

The next steps in this project would involve addressing the recommendations I made. The landing page could be reimagined to more clearly communicate the site's purpose. Below, I included a reimagining of what the landing page could look like.


Additionally, there also could be a shift to a free consultation before users commit to a paid service which also might impact the overall flow. There are features that could potentially be incorporated on the site as well in terms of a payment section and an intake section both of which are currently absent from the site.


Summary of Delivery Stage

During the Deliver stage, I wrapped up the design process with the following elements:

  • A final prototype with redesigned confirmation screens, modified copy in the services and landing page and modified UI patterns in the booking flow.
  • A proposed eimagining of the landing page and recommendations for later iterations based on critical user feedback that was deprioritized

* * * * *

Conclusion


While this project did not take a bunch of twists and turns, it was a crash course in collaborating with a stakeholder. I was challenged to be organized and communicate clearly in order for the best design decisions to be made. The usability tests provided really rich feedback but the stakeholder was really committed to achieving their goals of having a site that was minimally usable and attractive. This demonstrated to me how the stakeholder's desires can be a roadblock to implement changes that users truly desire. While I think I knew this as a customer/user of products, it was fascinating to witness it unfold from the business/design perspective.